So I take it you're vegan, don't wear any animal products (fur, leather etc), never say something rude to anyone, never talk behind anyone's back, never fight anyone, and so on and so forth, or at least try as hard as you humanly can to follow these things (you should be vegan regardless, it isn't that hard to follow if you think it's right)? After all, by your definition of bad you ought to follow these.
I too, like radical thinking, though I'm more the fan of the other side.
First off, I was very obviously using the "you hurt the llama" part as a metaphor, or even a joke. The whole point was pretty much a simplified version of worrying for the doom of our race, I was hoping you'd get it instead of taking words individually again.
If we allow people to have sex with whatever they want, whenever they want, they might choose to do so, even with animals, since that's the simpler way. People using that opportunity (even today) forget that sex is not about satisfaction, it's about reproduction. The survival of our race. It's easy to fuck someone, it's not easy to bear the weight of a relationship, or even a child. Thus, more and more people (will) choose the easier way, and one day they will be in majority. Not reproducing is harmful to our race, obviously enough. 'Greater good', as I previously said. Sense it!
And uh, if you're going personal, I'm not a vegan. I couldn't care less for animals which were
bred to be eaten. I care about people though and yes, I try to avoid saying bad to people, talking behind their backs, lying and using them as tools. I'm not a Saint, but I try; another piece of human nature, detectable in most, if not all people. Accidents happen though, and as my father-in-law usually says: "everything is decided in the brain"
We are animals, so yes there are animals which can do that. In addition, it's not about trying to be animals, it's about not trying to not be animals.
Can a dog put its house into its neck, like a turtle does? Can an elephant fly? Can a snake walk? Why should they try?
The thing with the -isms that you don't seem to understand is that they aren't centred in people being different; for example, it isn't sexist to acknowledge that only women can give birth. They're centred in irrational bias; for example, not hiring black people just because they're black.
Yeah, that's the neo-liberal interpretation of "-isms", according to which, all of them are bad, since it takes the most aberrated, radical form of each. The point of ideologies is that they're ideal and not real, but in reality, everything has its phases, but each and every one is about establishing a society, in which clear roles are defined. If someone is genetically more capable of doing a certain job than another job, then he should fucking do it, and should not be influenced by illusions. But leeeeet's not talk about
this here....
