- Joined
- Aug 13, 2009
- Messages
- 197
If blizzard makes their servers like wow realms that you've to pay monthly to play on it another community will grow and make a private starcraft 2 server for sure. Like eurobattle did with WC3.
If blizzard makes their servers like wow realms that you've to pay monthly to play on it another community will grow and make a private starcraft 2 server for sure. Like eurobattle did with WC3.
If blizzard makes their servers like wow realms that you've to pay monthly to play on it another community will grow and make a private starcraft 2 server for sure. Like eurobattle did with WC3.
Lol this takes completely off! Some people refuses to buy SC2, without doing closer investigations.
And I wonder how Blizzard is going to make BNET 2.0 hack proof?
I love how people have a preconception that companies and therefore blizzard are evil, and therefore any rumours portraying them as evil must be true, and therefore they're evil.
And I expected the internet to be at least a tad smarter than those in real life...
No it isn't, and they would be stupid to do so.but SC2 is supposedly going to allow C++ instead of JASS
No it isn't, and they would be stupid to do so.
Everyone here knows they're using Galaxy which is a bit similar to C.
By saying you wouldn't spend 2.99$ for DotA... well I bet thousands of players would. That game created several hundred hours of gameplay which is like unreachable with most modern 50-60$ FPS for example.
Everyone here knows they're using Galaxy which is a bit similar to C.
By saying you wouldn't spend 2.99$ for DotA... well I bet thousands of players would. That game created several hundred hours of gameplay which is like unreachable with most modern 50-60$ FPS for example.
Everyone here knows they're using Galaxy which is a bit similar to C.
Indeed. Hopefully it has similar syntax; I'm a little hooked on braces and the like.Ah you're right. I recalled incorrectly. SC2 will use a scripting language LIKE C.
http://planetstarcraft.gamespy.com/View.php?view=Articles.Detail&id=80
IceFrog is in the fucking money now.
Dreadnought[dA];1298732 said:Anybody could make a better map for free.
I would not buy maps... would buy a game, but a maps from a game, no thanks... ccc
if I woul be force to buy a map to play a game actually i will throw that game in the trash.
Like if you are a dota player you have to buy dota map. coz everyone is playing dota.
Dreadnought[dA];1298732 said:Anybody could make a better map for free.
He said a better map than DotA. Read quotes for context in the future.
Wrong idea, anybody could make a good map for free, but a small company or group can make an excellent map for a small price.
Reason: Funded, profit, teams, and better connection with blizzard.
The concept of DotA can only go so far no matter how much money you throw at it, as the commercial DotA spinoffs seem to have demonstrated.
We don't know for sure that Dota will dominate the Sc2 custom games. You see the warcraft III is a adventural game, while starcraft II contains high tech stuff and more modern like maps will be easier to make. Well dota means defender of the ancients. What ancients do we have in sc2? Maybe we'll have a dota/battle tanks like map in sc2? Xel'Naga and bobbo the ancient terran?
I'm not entirely sure if dota will dominate the same way as it does in wc3.
will this be based on the quality of the map or popularity?
Some really bad maps are extremely popular.
will this be based on the quality of the map or popularity?
Some really bad maps are extremely popular.
No, they are designed primarily to produce some product or execute some service. If their prime directive were to simply make money, we would have more crime. It just so happens that people will pay money for products or services. Some companies get confused and, "Think of how much money we could make!" Companies get spite and eventually run into the ground thinking like that.Companies are designed primarily to profit.
Doesn't Steam cost money, making hacking attempts costly?That will be impossible, bnet 2.0 cannot be hacked. Its like trying to hack steam.
Like lifting literally tons of solid material into the air, with no connection to the ground?Dreadnought[dA];1297232 said:Try hacking air.
I really hope DotA ends up not being free. That way, I have no chance of accidentally joining a DotA game, I can easily filter DotA games out, and I have an excuse when someone wants to play a DotA game with me; "Oh, I have no money, sorry man".
No, they are designed primarily to produce some product or execute some service. If their prime directive were to simply make money, we would have more crime. It just so happens that people will pay money for products or services. Some companies get confused and, "Think of how much money we could make!" Companies get spite and eventually run into the ground thinking like that.
Doesn't Steam cost money, making hacking attempts costly?
Like lifting literally tons of solid material into the air, with no connection to the ground?
Individual computers can be secure, but the nature of a network of computers makes network security impossible. Making an "unhackable" protocol is like trying to stop music from being copied ad infinitum once people get their hands on it. It is logically impossible.
![]()
So, youre thinking of it like of credits which you can buy?
Interesting. In that way it looks way better, however it is still the same - corrupt.
Man that is good and bad in the same time. Personally I would never pay for a map.
Also, I've been worried about SCII destroying WCIII. However it seems that SCII will not be as good as thought.